You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic Structure of Europeans: A View from the North–East
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005472 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mari Nelis, Tõnu Esko, Reedik Mägi, Fritz Zimprich, Alexander Zimprich, Draga Toncheva, Sena Karachanak, Tereza Piskáčková, Ivan Balaščák, Leena Peltonen, Eveliina Jakkula, Karola Rehnström, Mark Lathrop, Simon Heath, Pilar Galan, Stefan Schreiber, Thomas Meitinger, Arne Pfeufer, H-Erich Wichmann, Béla Melegh, Noémi Polgár, Daniela Toniolo, Paolo Gasparini, Pio D'Adamo, Janis Klovins, Liene Nikitina-Zake, Vaidutis Kučinskas, Jūratė Kasnauskienė, Jan Lubinski, Tadeusz Debniak, Svetlana Limborska, Andrey Khrunin, Xavier Estivill, Raquel Rabionet, Sara Marsal, Antonio Julià, Stylianos E. Antonarakis, Samuel Deutsch, Christelle Borel, Homa Attar, Maryline Gagnebin, Milan Macek, Michael Krawczak, Maido Remm, Andres Metspalu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 7% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 98% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 262 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 76 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 126 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 54 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#787,682
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,374
of 225,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,783
of 105,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#24
of 513 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 513 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.