You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome resequencing and comparative variome analysis in a Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea collection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Data, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/sdata.2016.119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Feng Cheng, Jian Wu, Chengcheng Cai, Lixia Fu, Jianli Liang, Theo Borm, Mu Zhuang, Yangyong Zhang, Fenglan Zhang, Guusje Bonnema, Xiaowu Wang |
| Abstract |
The closely related species Brassica rapa and B. oleracea encompass a wide range of vegetable, fodder and oil crops. The release of their reference genomes has facilitated resequencing collections of B. rapa and B. oleracea aiming to build their variome datasets. These data can be used to investigate the evolutionary relationships between and within the different species and the domestication of the crops, hereafter named morphotypes. These data can also be used in genetic studies aiming at the identification of genes that influence agronomic traits. We selected and resequenced 199 B. rapa and 119 B. oleracea accessions representing 12 and nine morphotypes, respectively. Based on these resequencing data, we obtained 2,249,473 and 3,852,169 high quality SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms), as well as 303,617 and 417,004 InDels for the B. rapa and B. oleracea populations, respectively. The variome datasets of B. rapa and B. oleracea represent valuable resources to researchers working on evolution, domestication or breeding of Brassica vegetable crops. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Canada | 6 | 11% |
| India | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Iceland | 2 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 77% |
| Scientists | 9 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,084,188
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#451
of 3,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,951
of 425,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.