↓ Skip to main content

MOR Is Not Enough: Identification of Novel mu-Opioid Receptor Interacting Proteins Using Traditional and Modified Membrane Yeast Two-Hybrid Screens

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MOR Is Not Enough: Identification of Novel mu-Opioid Receptor Interacting Proteins Using Traditional and Modified Membrane Yeast Two-Hybrid Screens
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0067608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Petko, Stephanie Justice-Bitner, Jay Jin, Victoria Wong, Saranya Kittanakom, Thomas N. Ferraro, Igor Stagljar, Robert Levenson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,404,272
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#131,518
of 195,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,404
of 195,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,089
of 4,786 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,786 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.