You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A procedure for the assessment of low frequency noise complaintsa)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1121/1.3180695 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andy T. Moorhouse, David C. Waddington, Mags D. Adams |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,802,325
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
#860
of 10,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,053
of 102,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.