You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Evasive mating behaviour by female nurse sharks, Ginglymostoma cirratum (Bonnaterre, 1788), in an equatorial insular breeding ground
Neotropical Ichthyology, January 2016
André S. Afonso, Carlos V. Cantareli, Rafael P. Levy, Leonardo B. Veras
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||50%|
|Members of the public||1||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||10||29%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||6||18%|
|Student > Bachelor||5||15%|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||11||32%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Neotropical Ichthyology
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 393,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neotropical Ichthyology
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.