↓ Skip to main content

Predicting size at first sexual maturity from length/weight relationship: a case study with an Amazonian catfish

Overview of attention for article published in Neotropical Ichthyology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting size at first sexual maturity from length/weight relationship: a case study with an Amazonian catfish
Published in
Neotropical Ichthyology, January 2016
DOI 10.1590/1982-0224-20150152
Authors

Tiago Magalhães da Silva Freitas, Vitor Hudson da Consolação Almeida, Luciano Fogaça de Assis Montag, Nelson Ferreira Fontoura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 30%
Environmental Science 14 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2016.
All research outputs
#14,008,150
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Neotropical Ichthyology
#412
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,893
of 393,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neotropical Ichthyology
#28
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.