You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New CRISPR–Cas systems from uncultivated microbes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature21059 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Burstein, Lucas B. Harrington, Steven C. Strutt, Alexander J. Probst, Karthik Anantharaman, Brian C. Thomas, Jennifer A. Doudna, Jillian F. Banfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 493 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 116 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 33 | 7% |
| Germany | 17 | 3% |
| Canada | 15 | 3% |
| Spain | 12 | 2% |
| India | 10 | 2% |
| France | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 8 | 2% |
| Mexico | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 70 | 14% |
| Unknown | 196 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 284 | 58% |
| Scientists | 185 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1098 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 239 | 21% |
| Researcher | 205 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 146 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 118 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 57 | 5% |
| Other | 152 | 13% |
| Unknown | 212 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 375 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 329 | 29% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 43 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 2% |
| Engineering | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 113 | 10% |
| Unknown | 231 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 619. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#37,059
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,242
of 98,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#771
of 425,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#64
of 886 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 886 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.