The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Higher versus lower nut consumption and changes in cognitive performance over two years in a population at risk of cognitive decline: a cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.05.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiaqi Ni, Stephanie K. Nishi, Nancy Babio, Emilio Ros, F Javier Basterra-Gortari, Dolores Corella, O Castañer, J Alfredo Martínez, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, Jesús Vioque, Dora Romaguera, José López-Miranda, Ramon Estruch, Francisco J. Tinahones, José Manuel Santos-Lozano, Lluís Serra-Majem, Naomi Cano-Ibáñez, Josep A. Tur, José Manuel Fernández-García, Xavier Pintó, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía-Martín, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Lidia Daimiel, Fernando Fernández-Aranda, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Cristina Mestres Solà, Olga Portolés, Aleix Sala-Vila, Antonio Garcia-Rios, Laura María Compañ-Gabucio, Enrique Gómez-Gracia, M Angeles Zulet, Alice Chaplin, Rosa Casas, Silvia Martínez-Diz, Lucas Tojal-Sierra, Ana María Gómez-Pérez, Estefanía Toledo, Santiago Rios, Carolina Ortega-Azorín, Rafael de la Torre, Patricia J. Peña-Orihuela, Manuela Garcia-de la Hera, Carmen Sayón-Orea, Mireia Malcampo, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, the PREDIMED-Plus investigators |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Jordan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 26% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 845. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#22,773
of 26,375,196 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#75
of 12,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#636
of 400,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.