↓ Skip to main content

酸化チタンの結晶化と光触媒活性の発現

Overview of attention for article published in Denki Kagaku oyobi Kogyo Butsuri Kagaku, September 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
酸化チタンの結晶化と光触媒活性の発現
Published in
Denki Kagaku oyobi Kogyo Butsuri Kagaku, September 1985
DOI 10.5796/kogyobutsurikagaku.53.736
Authors

原田 久志, 菅野 等, 上田 豊甫

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#17,730,887
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Denki Kagaku oyobi Kogyo Butsuri Kagaku
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,897
of 9,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Denki Kagaku oyobi Kogyo Butsuri Kagaku
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them