↓ Skip to main content

Methadone at tapered doses for the management of opioid withdrawal

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methadone at tapered doses for the management of opioid withdrawal
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003409.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Amato, Marina Davoli, Silvia Minozzi, Eliana Ferroni, Robert Ali, Marica Ferri

Abstract

The evidence of tapered methadone's efficacy in managing opioid withdrawal has been systematically evaluated in the previous version of this review that needs to be updated

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 321 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 15%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 10%
Student > Postgraduate 26 8%
Other 69 21%
Unknown 69 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 39%
Psychology 35 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 6%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 78 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,035,835
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,281
of 12,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,716
of 194,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.