You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Part 2—Emergency Laparotomy: Intra‐ and Postoperative Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-023-07020-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J. Scott, Geeta Aggarwal, Robert J. Aitken, Iain D. Anderson, Angie Balfour, Nicolai Bang Foss, Zara Cooper, Jugdeep K. Dhesi, W. Brenton French, Michael C. Grant, Folke Hammarqvist, Sarah P. Hare, Joaquim M. Havens, Daniel N. Holena, Martin Hübner, Carolyn Johnston, Jeniffer S. Kim, Nicholas P. Lees, Olle Ljungqvist, Dileep N. Lobo, Shahin Mohseni, Carlos A. Ordoñez, Nial Quiney, Catherine Sharoky, Richard D. Urman, Elizabeth Wick, Christopher L. Wu, Tonia Young-Fadok, Carol J. Peden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 19% |
| Mexico | 7 | 7% |
| Colombia | 6 | 6% |
| Denmark | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Honduras | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 18% |
| Scientists | 13 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 45 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#547,226
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#37
of 4,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,556
of 391,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.