Title |
Stimulating at the right time: phase-specific deep brain stimulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brain, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1093/brain/aww286 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hayriye Cagnan, David Pedrosa, Simon Little, Alek Pogosyan, Binith Cheeran, Tipu Aziz, Alexander Green, James Fitzgerald, Thomas Foltynie, Patricia Limousin, Ludvic Zrinzo, Marwan Hariz, Karl J. Friston, Timothy Denison, Peter Brown |
Abstract |
Brain regions dynamically engage and disengage with one another to execute everyday actions from movement to decision making. Pathologies such as Parkinson's disease and tremor emerge when brain regions controlling movement cannot readily decouple, compromising motor function. Here, we propose a novel stimulation strategy that selectively regulates neural synchrony through phase-specific stimulation. We demonstrate for the first time the therapeutic potential of such a stimulation strategy for the treatment of patients with pathological tremor. Symptom suppression is achieved by delivering stimulation to the ventrolateral thalamus, timed according to the patient's tremor rhythm. Sustained locking of deep brain stimulation to a particular phase of tremor afforded clinically significant tremor relief (up to 87% tremor suppression) in selected patients with essential tremor despite delivering less than half the energy of conventional high frequency stimulation. Phase-specific stimulation efficacy depended on the resonant characteristics of the underlying tremor network. Selective regulation of neural synchrony through phase-locked stimulation has the potential to both increase the efficiency of therapy and to minimize stimulation-induced side effects. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 14 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 271 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 25% |
Researcher | 55 | 20% |
Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
Professor | 15 | 5% |
Other | 51 | 18% |
Unknown | 46 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 76 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 14% |
Engineering | 35 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
Psychology | 12 | 4% |
Other | 25 | 9% |
Unknown | 73 | 26% |