You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relative Quality of Internet-Derived Gastrointestinal Cancer Information
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Education, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13187-012-0408-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David S. Y. Chan, Anita Willicombe, Thomas D. Reid, Ceri Beaton, David Arnold, James Ward, I. Llion Davies, Wyn G. Lewis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 30% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 55% |
| Psychology | 3 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,726,418
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#169
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,926
of 169,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.