↓ Skip to main content

Taurine deficiency as a driver of aging

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taurine deficiency as a driver of aging
Published in
Science, June 2023
DOI 10.1126/science.abn9257
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parminder Singh, Kishore Gollapalli, Stefano Mangiola, Daniela Schranner, Mohd Aslam Yusuf, Manish Chamoli, Sting L Shi, Bruno Lopes Bastos, Tripti Nair, Annett Riermeier, Elena M Vayndorf, Judy Z Wu, Aishwarya Nilakhe, Christina Q Nguyen, Michael Muir, Michael G Kiflezghi, Anna Foulger, Alex Junker, Jack Devine, Kunal Sharan, Shankar J Chinta, Swati Rajput, Anand Rane, Philipp Baumert, Martin Schönfelder, Francescopaolo Iavarone, Giorgia di Lorenzo, Swati Kumari, Alka Gupta, Rajesh Sarkar, Costerwell Khyriem, Amanpreet S Chawla, Ankur Sharma, Nazan Sarper, Naibedya Chattopadhyay, Bichitra K Biswal, Carmine Settembre, Perumal Nagarajan, Kimara L Targoff, Martin Picard, Sarika Gupta, Vidya Velagapudi, Anthony T Papenfuss, Alaattin Kaya, Miguel Godinho Ferreira, Brian K Kennedy, Julie K Andersen, Gordon J Lithgow, Abdullah Mahmood Ali, Arnab Mukhopadhyay, Aarno Palotie, Gabi Kastenmüller, Matt Kaeberlein, Henning Wackerhage, Bhupinder Pal, Vijay K Yadav

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,431 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 317 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Professor 19 6%
Other 16 5%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 104 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 8%
Neuroscience 20 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 116 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4018. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,228
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from Science
#68
of 83,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 390,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#1
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.