The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changes to virus taxonomy and the ICTV Statutes ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2023)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Virology, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00705-023-05797-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francisco Murilo Zerbini, Stuart G. Siddell, Elliot J. Lefkowitz, Arcady R. Mushegian, Evelien M. Adriaenssens, Poliane Alfenas‑Zerbini, Donald M. Dempsey, Bas E. Dutilh, María Laura García, R. Curtis Hendrickson, Sandra Junglen, Mart Krupovic, Jens H. Kuhn, Amy J. Lambert, Małgorzata Łobocka, Hanna M. Oksanen, David L. Robertson, Luisa Rubino, Sead Sabanadzovic, Peter Simmonds, Donald B. Smith, Nobuhiro Suzuki, Koenraad Van Doorslaer, Anne‑Mieke Vandamme, Arvind Varsani |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 52 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 58% |
| Scientists | 23 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#970,803
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#33
of 4,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,544
of 393,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#3
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,630 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.