↓ Skip to main content

Trends in childhood type 1 diabetes incidence in Europe during 1989–2008: evidence of non-uniformity over time in rates of increase

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in childhood type 1 diabetes incidence in Europe during 1989–2008: evidence of non-uniformity over time in rates of increase
Published in
Diabetologia, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00125-012-2571-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. C. Patterson, E. Gyürüs, J. Rosenbauer, O. Cinek, A. Neu, E. Schober, R. C. Parslow, G. Joner, J. Svensson, C. Castell, P. J. Bingley, E. Schoenle, P. Jarosz-Chobot, B. Urbonaité, U. Rothe, C. Krzisnik, C. Ionescu-Tirgoviste, I. Weets, M. Kocova, G. Stipancic, M. Samardzic, C. E. de Beaufort, A Green, G. G. Dahlquist, G. Soltész

Abstract

The aim of the study was to describe 20-year incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in 23 EURODIAB centres and compare rates of increase in the first (1989-1998) and second (1999-2008) halves of the period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 323 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 15%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 78 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 3%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 90 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,643,868
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#912
of 5,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,462
of 164,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.