The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enclosed nests may provide greater thermal than nest predation benefits compared with open nests across latitudes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Functional Ecology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2435.12819 |
| Authors |
Thomas E. Martin, Andy J. Boyce, Karolina Fierro‐Calderón, Adam E. Mitchell, Connor E. Armstad, James C. Mouton, Evertius E. Bin Soudi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Colombia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,563,395
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#289
of 2,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,745
of 425,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.