↓ Skip to main content

Enclosed nests may provide greater thermal than nest predation benefits compared with open nests across latitudes

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Ecology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enclosed nests may provide greater thermal than nest predation benefits compared with open nests across latitudes
Published in
Functional Ecology, January 2017
DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12819
Authors

Thomas E. Martin, Andy J. Boyce, Karolina Fierro-Calderón, Adam E. Mitchell, Connor E. Armstad, James C. Mouton, Evertius E. Bin Soudi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Student > Master 14 22%
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Unspecified 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 73%
Environmental Science 8 13%
Unspecified 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,015,598
of 12,960,324 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#462
of 1,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,026
of 368,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#27
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,960,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.