You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What is the “modified” CTAB protocol? Characterizing modifications to the CTAB DNA extraction protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applications in Plant Sciences, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/aps3.11517 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John J. Schenk, L. Ellie Becklund, S. James Carey, Paige P. Fabre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 14% |
India | 6 | 5% |
Italy | 4 | 4% |
Germany | 3 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Kenya | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Indonesia | 2 | 2% |
Colombia | 2 | 2% |
Other | 33 | 29% |
Unknown | 41 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 71 | 62% |
Scientists | 39 | 34% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Researcher | 7 | 7% |
Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 72 | 69% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 73 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#648,578
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Applications in Plant Sciences
#18
of 603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,690
of 394,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applications in Plant Sciences
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.