| Title |
Assessing real-world gait with digital technology? Validation, insights and recommendations from the Mobilise-D consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-023-01198-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Encarna Micó-Amigo, Tecla Bonci, Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu, Martin Ullrich, Cameron Kirk, Abolfazl Soltani, Arne Küderle, Eran Gazit, Francesca Salis, Lisa Alcock, Kamiar Aminian, Clemens Becker, Stefano Bertuletti, Philip Brown, Ellen Buckley, Alma Cantu, Anne-Elie Carsin, Marco Caruso, Brian Caulfield, Andrea Cereatti, Lorenzo Chiari, Ilaria D’Ascanio, Bjoern Eskofier, Sara Fernstad, Marcel Froehlich, Judith Garcia-Aymerich, Clint Hansen, Jeffrey M. Hausdorff, Hugo Hiden, Emily Hume, Alison Keogh, Felix Kluge, Sarah Koch, Walter Maetzler, Dimitrios Megaritis, Arne Mueller, Martijn Niessen, Luca Palmerini, Lars Schwickert, Kirsty Scott, Basil Sharrack, Henrik Sillén, David Singleton, Beatrix Vereijken, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Alison J. Yarnall, Lynn Rochester, Claudia Mazzà, Silvia Del Din |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Czechia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 54% |
| Scientists | 12 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,746,283
of 24,501,737 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#63
of 1,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,784
of 357,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,501,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.