↓ Skip to main content

Assessing real-world gait with digital technology? Validation, insights and recommendations from the Mobilise-D consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing real-world gait with digital technology? Validation, insights and recommendations from the Mobilise-D consortium
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, June 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12984-023-01198-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Encarna Micó-Amigo, Tecla Bonci, Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu, Martin Ullrich, Cameron Kirk, Abolfazl Soltani, Arne Küderle, Eran Gazit, Francesca Salis, Lisa Alcock, Kamiar Aminian, Clemens Becker, Stefano Bertuletti, Philip Brown, Ellen Buckley, Alma Cantu, Anne-Elie Carsin, Marco Caruso, Brian Caulfield, Andrea Cereatti, Lorenzo Chiari, Ilaria D’Ascanio, Bjoern Eskofier, Sara Fernstad, Marcel Froehlich, Judith Garcia-Aymerich, Clint Hansen, Jeffrey M. Hausdorff, Hugo Hiden, Emily Hume, Alison Keogh, Felix Kluge, Sarah Koch, Walter Maetzler, Dimitrios Megaritis, Arne Mueller, Martijn Niessen, Luca Palmerini, Lars Schwickert, Kirsty Scott, Basil Sharrack, Henrik Sillén, David Singleton, Beatrix Vereijken, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Alison J. Yarnall, Lynn Rochester, Claudia Mazzà, Silvia Del Din

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Other 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Computer Science 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 35 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,746,283
of 24,501,737 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#63
of 1,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,784
of 357,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,501,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.