The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Uncertainty management in regulatory and health technology assessment decision-making on drugs: guidance of the HTAi-DIA Working Group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0266462323000375 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Milou Amber Hogervorst, Rick Vreman, Inkatuuli Heikkinen, Indranil Bagchi, Inaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Bettina Ryll, Hans-Georg Eichler, Elena Petelos, Sean Tunis, Claudine Sapede, Wim Goettsch, Rosanne Janssens, Isabelle Huys, Liese Barbier, Deirdre DeJean, Valentina Strammiello, Dimitra Lingri, Melinda Goodall, Magdalini Papadaki, Massoud Toussi, Despina Voulgaraki, Ania Mitan, Wija Oortwijn |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 68% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,157,913
of 24,826,104 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
#153
of 1,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,501
of 339,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,826,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,594 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.