↓ Skip to main content

A critique of the WHO TobReg's "Advisory Note" report entitled: "Waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects, research needs and recommended actions by regulators"

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 111)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A critique of the WHO TobReg's "Advisory Note" report entitled: "Waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects, research needs and recommended actions by regulators"
Published in
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, November 2006
DOI 10.1186/1477-5751-5-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamal Chaouachi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Jordan 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 37%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,568,936
of 17,033,237 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#33
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,282
of 163,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,033,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them