You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A meta-analysis of GFR slope as a surrogate endpoint for kidney failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Medicine, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41591-023-02418-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lesley A. Inker, Willem Collier, Tom Greene, Shiyuan Miao, Juhi Chaudhari, Gerald B. Appel, Sunil V. Badve, Fernando Caravaca-Fontán, Lucia Del Vecchio, Jürgen Floege, Marian Goicoechea, Benjamin Haaland, William G. Herrington, Enyu Imai, Tazeen H. Jafar, Julia B. Lewis, Philip K. T. Li, Bart D. Maes, Brendon L. Neuen, Ronald D. Perrone, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Francesco P. Schena, Christoph Wanner, Jack F. M. Wetzels, Mark Woodward, Hiddo J. L. Heerspink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
India | 4 | 7% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Belgium | 2 | 3% |
Mauritius | 1 | 2% |
Egypt | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 39 | 64% |
Scientists | 14 | 23% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 23% |
Researcher | 6 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 50% |
Mathematics | 2 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#731,754
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#2,086
of 9,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,960
of 385,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#76
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.