You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Scaling up complex interventions: insights from a realist synthesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12961-016-0158-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cameron D. Willis, Barbara L. Riley, Lisa Stockton, Aneta Abramowicz, Dana Zummach, Geoff Wong, Kerry L. Robinson, Allan Best |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 29% |
Egypt | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Pakistan | 1 | 7% |
Ireland | 1 | 7% |
Senegal | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 177 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 23% |
Researcher | 39 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 10% |
Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 4% |
Other | 25 | 14% |
Unknown | 32 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 33 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
Psychology | 12 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
Other | 24 | 13% |
Unknown | 46 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,366,334
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#485
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,796
of 433,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.