You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
HIV Prevalence by Race Co-Varies Closely with Concurrency and Number of Sex Partners in South Africa
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0064080 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chris Kenyon, Jozefien Buyze, Robert Colebunders |
Abstract |
HIV prevalence differs by more than an order of magnitude between South Africa's racial groups. Comparing the sexual behaviors and other risk factors for HIV transmission between the different races may shed light on the determinants of South Africa's generalized HIV epidemic. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 2 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 79 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
Researcher | 15 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 17% |
Psychology | 7 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,953,865
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#56,585
of 193,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,345
of 195,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,098
of 4,888 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,888 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.