↓ Skip to main content

Morbid Obesity as a Risk Factor for Hospitalization and Death Due to 2009 Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) Disease

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
370 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morbid Obesity as a Risk Factor for Hospitalization and Death Due to 2009 Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) Disease
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009694
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver W. Morgan, Anna Bramley, Ashley Fowlkes, David S. Freedman, Thomas H. Taylor, Paul Gargiullo, Brook Belay, Seema Jain, Chad Cox, Laurie Kamimoto, Anthony Fiore, Lyn Finelli, Sonja J. Olsen, Alicia M. Fry

Abstract

Severe illness due to 2009 pandemic A(H1N1) infection has been reported among persons who are obese or morbidly obese. We assessed whether obesity is a risk factor for hospitalization and death due to 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1), independent of chronic medical conditions considered by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to increase the risk of influenza-related complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 255 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 15%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 57 22%
Unknown 53 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 62 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#439,882
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,159
of 221,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,135
of 102,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#27
of 681 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 681 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.