You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immunopotentiation of Trivalent Influenza Vaccine When Given with VAX102, a Recombinant Influenza M2e Vaccine Fused to the TLR5 Ligand Flagellin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0014442 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. Keipp Talbot, Michael T. Rock, Casey Johnson, Lynda Tussey, Uma Kavita, Anita Shanker, Alan R. Shaw, David N. Taylor |
| Abstract |
Currently controversy exists about the immunogenicity of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine in certain populations, especially the elderly. STF2.4×M2e (VAX102) is a recombinant fusion protein that links four copies of the ectodomain of influenza virus matrix protein 2 (M2e) antigen to Salmonella typhimurium flagellin, a TLR5 ligand. The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility of giving VAX102 and TIV in combination in an effort to achieve greater immunogenicity and to provide cross-protection. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,879,419
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,259
of 193,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,815
of 180,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#173
of 1,096 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,096 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.