↓ Skip to main content

The role of sediment ingestion in exposing wood ducks to lead

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of sediment ingestion in exposing wood ducks to lead
Published in
Ecotoxicology, May 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1018670626114
Authors

W. Nelson Beyer, LAWRENCE J. Blus, CHARLES J. Henny, DAN Audet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#304
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,549
of 29,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them