↓ Skip to main content

Neuroblastoma: developmental biology, cancer genomics and immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cancer, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
647 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
741 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroblastoma: developmental biology, cancer genomics and immunotherapy
Published in
Nature Reviews Cancer, May 2013
DOI 10.1038/nrc3526
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nai-Kong V. Cheung, Michael A. Dyer

Abstract

Neuroblastoma is a solid tumour that arises from the developing sympathetic nervous system. Over the past decade, our understanding of this disease has advanced tremendously. The future challenge is to apply the knowledge gained to developing risk-based therapies and, ultimately, improving outcome. In this Review we discuss the key discoveries in the developmental biology, molecular genetics and immunology of neuroblastoma, as well as new translational tools for bringing these promising scientific advances into the clinic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 741 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Ecuador 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 718 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 136 18%
Student > Master 102 14%
Researcher 99 13%
Student > Bachelor 98 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 6%
Other 130 18%
Unknown 134 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 191 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 143 19%
Neuroscience 19 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 2%
Other 71 10%
Unknown 149 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,744,515
of 25,839,971 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#606
of 2,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,079
of 208,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,839,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.