You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mechanisms of equality and inequality in mammalian societies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2022.0307 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer E. Smith, Barbara Natterson-Horowitz, Maddison M. Mueller, Michael E. Alfaro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 28% |
Canada | 2 | 11% |
France | 1 | 6% |
India | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Japan | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
Scientists | 5 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 20% |
Psychology | 2 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,281,255
of 25,930,027 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,127
of 7,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,824
of 381,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#18
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.