You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How the Use of BMI Fetishizes White Embodiment and Racializes Fat Phobia.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2023.535 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabrina Strings |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 38% |
| Comoros | 2 | 3% |
| Sri Lanka | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 81% |
| Scientists | 8 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 1 | 11% |
| Psychology | 1 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2024.
All research outputs
#548,296
of 26,011,622 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#134
of 2,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,187
of 376,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,011,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.