↓ Skip to main content

Back pain and MRI changes in the thoraco‐lumbar spine of top athletes in four different sports: a 15‐year follow‐up study

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Back pain and MRI changes in the thoraco‐lumbar spine of top athletes in four different sports: a 15‐year follow‐up study
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00167-009-0767-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adad Baranto, Mikael Hellström, C.‐G. Cederlund, Rickard Nyman, Leif Swärd

Abstract

A total 71 male athletes (weight lifters, wrestlers, orienteers, and ice-hockey players) and 21 non-athletes were randomly selected, for a baseline MRI study. After 15 years all the participants at baseline were invited to take part in a follow-up examination, including a questionnaire on back pain and a follow-up MRI examination. Thirty-two athletes and all non-athletes had disc height reduction at one or several disc levels. Disc degeneration was found in more than 90% of the athletes and deterioration had occurred in 88% of the athletes, with the highest frequency in weight lifters and ice-hockey players. 78% of the athletes and 38% of the non-athletes reported previous or present history of back pain at baseline and 71 and 75%, respectively at follow-up. There was no statistically significant correlation between back pain and MRI changes. In conclusion, athletes in sports with severe or moderate demands on the back run a high risk of developing disc degeneration and other abnormalities of the spine on MRI and they report high frequency of back pain. The study confirmed our hypothesis, i.e. that most of the spinal abnormalities in athletes seem to occur during the growth spurt, since the majority of the abnormalities demonstrated at follow-up MRI after the sports career were present already at baseline. The abnormalities found at young age deteriorated to a varying degree during the 15-year follow-up, probably due to a combination of continued high load sporting activities and normal ageing. Preventive measures should be considered to avoid the development of these injuries in young athletes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Postgraduate 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 30%
Sports and Recreations 26 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 41 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,620,166
of 25,241,031 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,935
of 2,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,886
of 104,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,241,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.