↓ Skip to main content

Willingness to Use the Oral Fluid HIV Rapid Test among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Beijing, China

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Willingness to Use the Oral Fluid HIV Rapid Test among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Beijing, China
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0064652
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunan Xu, Zheng Zhang, Dongliang Li, Yingjie Liu, Stephen W. Pan, Xiao Qi, Bo Wang, Fengji Luo, Dong Xiao, Yiming Shao, Yuhua Ruan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Master 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 23%
Social Sciences 12 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Psychology 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,689,083
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#110,774
of 193,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,444
of 195,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,632
of 4,888 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,888 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.