You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why Are Women Dying When They Reach Hospital on Time? A Systematic Review of the ‘Third Delay’
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0063846 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah E. Knight, Alice Self, Stephen H. Kennedy |
| Abstract |
The 'three delays model' attempts to explain delays in women accessing emergency obstetric care as the result of: 1) decision-making, 2) accessing services and 3) receipt of appropriate care once a health facility is reached. The third delay, although under-researched, is likely to be a source of considerable inequity in access to emergency obstetric care in developing countries. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and categorise specific facility-level barriers to the provision of evidence-based maternal health care in developing countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Kenya | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 81% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 541 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 525 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 115 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 12% |
| Researcher | 57 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 103 | 19% |
| Unknown | 118 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 186 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 83 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 62 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 7% |
| Unknown | 141 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,094,858
of 25,996,988 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,903
of 226,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,342
of 209,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#294
of 4,922 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,996,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,922 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.