The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The efficacy of different interventions in the treatment of sarcopenia in middle-aged and elderly people: A network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medicine (Wolters Kluwer), July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1097/md.0000000000034254 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qian Geng, Haiting Zhai, Liming Wang, Hongwen Wei, Shilun Hou |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 111 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 91 | 65% |
| Scientists | 23 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#496,656
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Medicine (Wolters Kluwer)
#121
of 16,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,060
of 377,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine (Wolters Kluwer)
#3
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.