↓ Skip to main content

Mobile genetic elements of the human gastrointestinal tract

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Microbes, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
35 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobile genetic elements of the human gastrointestinal tract
Published in
Gut Microbes, October 2014
DOI 10.4161/gmic.24627
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eileen Broaders, Cormac G.M. Gahan, Julian R. Marchesi

Abstract

The human intestine is an important location for horizontal gene transfer (HGT) due to the presence of a densely populated community of microorganisms which are essential to the health of the human superorganism. HGT in this niche has the potential to influence the evolution of members of this microbial community and to mediate the spread of antibiotic resistance genes from commensal organisms to potential pathogens. Recent culture-independent techniques and metagenomic studies have provided an insight into the distribution of mobile genetic elements (MGEs) and the extent of HGT in the human gastrointestinal tract. In this mini-review, we explore the current knowledge of mobile genetic elements in the gastrointestinal tract, the progress of research into the distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in the gut and the potential role of MGEs in the spread of antibiotic resistance. In the face of reduced treatment options for many clinical infections, understanding environmental and commensal antibiotic resistance and spread is critical to the future development of meaningful and long lasting anti-microbial therapies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 203 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 18%
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Professor 10 5%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 48 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,470,952
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Gut Microbes
#757
of 1,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,539
of 262,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Microbes
#86
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.