↓ Skip to main content

Adeno-associated viral vectors for functional intravenous gene transfer throughout the non-human primate brain

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Nanotechnology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 3,821)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
56 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adeno-associated viral vectors for functional intravenous gene transfer throughout the non-human primate brain
Published in
Nature Nanotechnology, July 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41565-023-01419-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel R. Chuapoco, Nicholas C. Flytzanis, Nick Goeden, J. Christopher Octeau, Kristina M. Roxas, Ken Y. Chan, Jon Scherrer, Janet Winchester, Roy J. Blackburn, Lillian J. Campos, Kwun Nok Mimi Man, Junqing Sun, Xinhong Chen, Arthur Lefevre, Vikram Pal Singh, Cynthia M. Arokiaraj, Timothy F. Shay, Julia Vendemiatti, Min J. Jang, John K. Mich, Yemeserach Bishaw, Bryan B. Gore, Victoria Omstead, Naz Taskin, Natalie Weed, Boaz P. Levi, Jonathan T. Ting, Cory T. Miller, Benjamin E. Deverman, James Pickel, Lin Tian, Andrew S. Fox, Viviana Gradinaru

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 3 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 27 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 27 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 430. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#69,680
of 26,213,016 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#27
of 3,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,592
of 373,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#1
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.