You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transmission of MDR and XDR Tuberculosis in Shanghai, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ming Zhao, Xia Li, Peng Xu, Xin Shen, Xiaohong Gui, Lili Wang, Kathryn DeRiemer, Jian Mei, Qian Gao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,829,706
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,662
of 195,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,512
of 170,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#128
of 536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.