You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relationship between Food Insecurity and Mortality among HIV-Positive Injection Drug Users Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy in British Columbia, Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0061277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aranka Anema, Keith Chan, Yalin Chen, Sheri Weiser, Julio S. G. Montaner, Robert S. Hogg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 45% |
| South Africa | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 32% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#778,768
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,753
of 196,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,290
of 195,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#264
of 4,821 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,821 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.