The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
First‐line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008161.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcia Reinhart, Lorri Puil, Douglas M Salzwedel, James M Wright |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 8% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| Libya | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 106 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 105 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 11% |
| Scientists | 9 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2024.
All research outputs
#529,706
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#876
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,571
of 374,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.