↓ Skip to main content

Modulatory Effects of the Piccolo Genotype on Emotional Memory in Health and Depression

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modulatory Effects of the Piccolo Genotype on Emotional Memory in Health and Depression
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0061494
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia Woudstra, Marie-José van Tol, Zoltán Bochdanovits, Nic J. van der Wee, Frans G. Zitman, Mark A. van Buchem, Esther M. Opmeer, André Aleman, Brenda W. Penninx, Dick J. Veltman, Witte J. Hoogendijk

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been associated with biased memory formation for mood-congruent information, which may be related to altered monoamine levels. The piccolo (PCLO) gene, involved in monoaminergic neurotransmission, has previously been linked to depression in a genome-wide association study. Here, we investigated the role of the PCLO risk allele on functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlates of emotional memory in a sample of 89 MDD patients (64 PCLO risk allele carriers) and 29 healthy controls (18 PCLO risk allele carriers). During negative word encoding, risk allele carriers showed significant lower activity relative to non-risk allele carriers in the insula, and trend-wise in the anterior cingulate cortex and inferior frontal gyrus. Moreover, depressed risk allele carriers showed significant lower activity relative to non-risk allele carriers in the striatum, an effect which was absent in healthy controls. Finally, amygdalar response during processing new positive words vs. known words was blunted in healthy PCLO+ carriers and in MDD patients irrespective of genotype, which may indicate that signalling of salient novel information does not occur to the same extent in PCLO+ carriers and MDD patients. The PCLO risk allele may increase vulnerability for MDD by modulating local brain function with regard to responsiveness to salient stimuli (i.e. insula) and processing novel negative information. Also, depression-specific effects of PCLO on dorsal striatal activation during negative word encoding and the absence of amygdalar salience signalling for novel positive information further suggest a role of PCLO in symptom maintenance in MDD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 4 5%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Neuroscience 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,611
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#130,175
of 193,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,432
of 197,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,225
of 5,134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.