You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
湿地型屋上緑化の水温変化におよぼす水生植物の効果
|
---|---|
Published in |
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.11353/sesj1988.18.535 |
Authors |
相崎 守弘, 隅田 茜 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 14 | 28% |
China | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 35 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 50 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,203,828
of 26,099,501 outputs
Outputs from ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
#1
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,594
of 106,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,099,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 40 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them