↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for modulation of facial emotional processing bias during emotional expression decoding by serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants: an event-related potential (ERP) study

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for modulation of facial emotional processing bias during emotional expression decoding by serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants: an event-related potential (ERP) study
Published in
Psychopharmacology, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00213-008-1340-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Kerestes, Izelle Labuschagne, Rodney J. Croft, Barry V. O’Neill, Zubin Bhagwagar, K. Luan Phan, Pradeep J. Nathan

Abstract

Serotonergic (SSRI) and noradrenergic (NRI) antidepressants modulate biases in emotional processing such that perceptual bias is shifted away from negative and towards positive emotional material. However, the effects of serotonergic and noradrenergic modulation on the temporal course (occurring in milliseconds) of emotional processing, and in particular, the rapid physiological changes associated with the different stages of emotional processing, are unknown.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
China 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 87 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 26 27%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Neuroscience 10 10%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,611
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#4,237
of 5,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,215
of 88,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#32
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.