You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Decellularization Protocols for Preparing a Decellularized Porcine Annulus Fibrosus Scaffold
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0086723 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haiwei Xu, Baoshan Xu, Qiang Yang, Xiulan Li, Xinlong Ma, Qun Xia, Yang Zhang, Chunqiu Zhang, Yaohong Wu, Yuanyuan Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 46 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 66 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,416,191
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#131,662
of 195,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,931
of 306,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,556
of 5,604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.