You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Microvesicular hyperplastic polyp and sessile serrated lesion of the large intestine: a biological continuum or separate entities?
Journal of Clinical Pathology, March 2023
Adrian C Bateman, Adam L Booth, Raul S Gonzalez, Neil A Shepherd
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||42||66%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||10||16%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||3%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||1||50%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||50%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||50%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,875,286 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Pathology
of 4,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 414,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Pathology
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,875,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.