The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human Trafficking, Mental Illness, and Addiction: Avoiding Diagnostic Overshadowing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.ecas3-1701 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanni Stoklosa, Marti MacGibbon, Joseph Stoklosa |
| Abstract |
This article reviews an emergency department-based clinical vignette of a trafficked patient with co-occurring pregnancy-related, mental health, and substance use disorder issues. The authors, including a survivor of human trafficking, draw on their backgrounds in addiction care, human trafficking, emergency medicine, and psychiatry to review the literature on relevant general health and mental health consequences of trafficking and propose an approach to the clinical complexities this case presents. In their discussion, the authors explicate the deleterious role of implicit bias and diagnostic overshadowing in trafficked patients with co-occurring addiction and mental illness. Finally, the authors propose a trauma-informed, multidisciplinary response to potentially trafficked patients. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 43 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 46 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 13% |
| Scientists | 7 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#623,274
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#147
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,648
of 427,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#5
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.