↓ Skip to main content

Chimpanzees and Bonobos Exhibit Emotional Responses to Decision Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
30 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chimpanzees and Bonobos Exhibit Emotional Responses to Decision Outcomes
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0063058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra G. Rosati, Brian Hare

Abstract

The interface between cognition, emotion, and motivation is thought to be of central importance in understanding complex cognitive functions such as decision-making and executive control in humans. Although nonhuman apes have complex repertoires of emotional expression, little is known about the role of affective processes in ape decision-making. To illuminate the evolutionary origins of human-like patterns of choice, we investigated decision-making in humans' closest phylogenetic relatives, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus). In two studies, we examined these species' temporal and risk preferences, and assessed whether apes show emotional and motivational responses in decision-making contexts. We find that (1) chimpanzees are more patient and more risk-prone than are bonobos, (2) both species exhibit affective and motivational responses following the outcomes of their decisions, and (3) some emotional and motivational responses map onto species-level and individual-differences in decision-making. These results indicate that apes do exhibit emotional responses to decision-making, like humans. We explore the hypothesis that affective and motivational biases may underlie the psychological mechanisms supporting value-based preferences in these species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 157 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Professor 15 9%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 25%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#200,211
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,956
of 225,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,264
of 209,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#65
of 4,786 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,786 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.