You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Communicative versus Strategic Rationality: Habermas Theory of Communicative Action and the Social Brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0065111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Schaefer, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Michael Rotte, Claudia Denke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 41% |
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 22 | 22% |
| Psychology | 12 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 11 | 11% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 25% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,257,356
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#27,345
of 226,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,471
of 209,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#628
of 4,786 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,786 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.