You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Randomized comparison of effectiveness of unimodal opioid analgesia with multimodal analgesia in post–cesarean section pain management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s44819 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adetunji Oladeni Adeniji, Oluseyi Olaboyede A Atanda |
Abstract |
Postoperative pain leads to patient discomfort, decreased level of satisfaction, prolonged recovery, and higher health costs. Acute pain control therefore improves the overall quality of life in patients undergoing cesarean section. Pain relief is a fundamental human right, but there is no gold standard for post-cesarean section pain management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Turkey | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 21% |
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 28 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,122,120
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#600
of 1,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,944
of 192,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.