↓ Skip to main content

Configuração das práticas de inovação na atenção primária à saúde: estudo de caso

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Configuração das práticas de inovação na atenção primária à saúde: estudo de caso
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, October 2015
DOI 10.1590/1413-812320152010.03262015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristine Hermann Nodari, Maria Emilia Camargo, Pelayo Munhoz Olea, Eric Charles Henri Dorion, Suzete Marchetto Claus

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the practice of innovation in primary healthcare in the second-largest county, by population, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The methodology employed case studies of multiple units of analysis, where various studies were simultaneously conducted. Forty-five semi-structured interviews were carried out with the directors of basic health clinics, followed by content analysis, beginning with the construction of a system of categories based on the literature. Fifty-six innovations in total were identified: Eighteen were innovations of products (goods and/or services), fifteen in processes, eleven in marketing, and twelve were organizational innovations. Studies that focus on and highlight innovation in primary healthcare facilitate changes, improvements, and alternatives in the form of services provided to the population, serving as a basis for the formulation of public health policy. Finally, we also highlight the limitations and opportunities of future research.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 30%
Lecturer 2 10%
Librarian 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 3 15%
Social Sciences 3 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 4 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,146,897
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#126
of 1,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,634
of 275,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,882 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.